This
is a paper that I enjoyed writing for my honors comp 1 class; it's written in
the Jeffersonian 18th century style and modeled after the Declaration of
Independence (obviously).
My
Declaration
When in
rational pursuit of the truth, it is found to be necessary that any man should
amend his own intellectual habits by which ideas are estimated, and presume no
superiority for the ideological fashions of his time beyond that which their
own merit and the unbiased reason itself will permit, a due respect for the
customs of the discipline of thought demands that he declare the causes which
impel him to such a position.
I hold
these truths to be self evident that, in all times, minds are created with the
equal faculty to know the truth, and that their power of reason, the which
endowed by their creator, holds them under obligation by certain unalienable
duties, that among these are intellectual honesty, diligence, and the pursuit
of truth. These duties entail that man should govern his mind with constant
vigilance such that when a persuasion becomes itself an impediment to these
ends, his duty is to rebut and rebuke it, and to prefer more sound and just
attitudes which shall be more effectual to the advancement of the true objects
of the reason, and if such a fallacious persuasion should publically prevail,
to earnestly advocate for its correction. Courtesy dictates that contention and
criticism should not be obtruded against prevalent attitudes for purposes of
minor consequence, but when such dispositions so pervasively and densely cloud
thought and obstruct truth and threaten to reduce multitudes under manifest and
bigoted delusion, then such critical opposition is not merely warranted but
demanded by all justice and truth. Such is the condition, very often, of
the modern western man that ignorance and prejudice against the institutions
and intuitions of the past and of its orthodoxies, and the submission to
intellectual fashion have inhibited the very mechanics of the reason and often
blinded its victims to the verity of the most obvious and demonstrable first
philosophies. But let the proceeding facts utter their own unadorned
accusations against modern chronocentrism that the rectitude of this declaration
may be unmistakable.
It has
often lured western nations into meddling amongst the affairs of those
civilizations whose values and institutions they have unjustly deemed to be
vestigial, detestable, and beneath their dignity without the sufficient understanding
or rational deliberation that is due for such a judgment.
It has
often possessed us to unjustly force ourselves upon these nations to subject
and govern them under our unauthorized rule or under the rule of despots whom
we have appointed.
It has often emboldened us
with arrogant and foolish confidence such that we rashly distain tradition and
the wisdom of our ancestors, scorning their customs, and inviting all perdition
and error providing only that it be of a novel and untraditional variety.
It has often incited
adolescent audacity, deliberate ignorance, and an unwarranted confidence in the
quality of our own doctrines, institutions, cultures, and governments that we
are even possessed of the impetus to exhume our defenseless forefathers in order
that we may take them to task for their sins and desecrate them.
It has, by the power of a mob
and through democratic tyranny oppressed and crushed under foot some who have
not ceased to respect tradition.
It has widely stunted the due
curiosity and appreciation of ancient thoughts and dialectics, it has also
greatly narrowed our interest in history; it draws us only to those most
present memories, leading us to widely forget or revise the greatest of
stories, myths, and legends and the richness of predeceased cultures, or
remember and love only those which remind us of ourselves and of our own birth.
Its narcissism has
vulgarized both man and God by the disfigurement of their relation one to
another: it has vulgarized God by revising His image so that He might be worthy
of us and of our great modern sensibilities, and in so doing, as God’s
creature, man has also been vulgarized, for he is no longer the creation of a
god, but a creation of his own hand.
It has invited the abuse of
reason herself and the violation of her true purpose by widely encouraging
frivolous appetites for mere intellectual fashion and amusement.
It has often deformed truth
and justice by tempting us to design them afresh, and by teaching us to reject,
in all cases whatsoever, those time-honored things which have known to be true
and just.
It has opposed true democracy
and unjustly sought to vest unbalanced power and authority in the members of
the small oligarchy of men who, by chance, presently happen to be living.
I
judge it to be true that if time has indeed favored anyone, then such favor
must belong those who take counsel with the dead; it must belong to those who
most honor the events and peoples of the past by clearly knowing,
understanding, and learning from them. It must belong to those who most humbly
and fairly consider the merits and faults of bygone cultures with the same
fair-mindedness by which they consider those of their own. No culture is
inherently superior, and time has no prejudices; having the capacity for great
humanity or great brutishness is the natural condition of all men and of these
capacities time is no corollary.
Therefore,
by the same natural power of reason which has been vested in all men, whose
obvious purpose is the true and accurate knowledge, inference, and
understanding of its perceptions, and by which error and inaccuracy are implied
both, to be, and to be its antithesis, I solemnly declare my
objection, renunciation, and resolution to be independent from all
chronocentric prejudice of thought and belief, and admit no natural superiority
in quality for men of any age or culture but confess equality among them all,
and to this conviction, and against vanity and conceit, I pledge all of the
vigilance and integrity that I possess.
Jason
Paone
4 comments:
It has a Chestertonian ring to it!
Haha, I thought you'd notice that Mike.
Loved it! It is a shame writers aren't "allowed" to write like that anymore, lest they be dismissed as pretentious or flowery. Good work!
Thanks Boo. Your right (I agree with you) this antiquated style of English has a unique elegance to it.
Post a Comment